Advertisement

Home / India / Delhi High Court division bench shifts Umar Khalid's bail plea

Delhi High Court division bench shifts Umar Khalid's bail plea

Let the matter be listed before Justices Mridul and Bhatnagar on Friday subject to the order of the Acting Chief Justice: HC
On May 6, the bench headed by Justice Mridul had listed Khalid’s bail plea for hearing on May 19.
On May 6, the bench headed by Justice Mridul had listed Khalid’s bail plea for hearing on May 19.
File photo

PTI   |   New Delhi   |   Published 20.05.22, 03:41 AM

A Delhi High Court division bench on Thursday transferred the bail plea of former JNU student Umar Khalid in a UAPA case related to the alleged conspiracy behind February 2020 Delhi riots to another bench for hearing on Friday. 

A bench headed by Justice Mukta Gupta considered the previous orders passed in the case and observed that the matter had been part-heard before the bench of Justices Siddharth Mridul and Rajnish Bhatnagar.

Advertisement

“Let the matter be listed before the bench of Justices Mridul and Bhatnagar on Friday subject to the order of the Acting Chief Justice,” the bench, also comprising Justice Mini Pushkarna, ordered.

On May 6, the bench headed by Justice Mridul had listed Khalid’s bail plea for hearing on May 19 and allowed him as well as the prosecution to place on record all the documents relevant for effective adjudication.

Khalid and several others have been booked under the anti-terror UAPA and provisions of the Indian Penal Code on the charge of being the “masterminds” of the riots, which had left 53 people dead and over 700 injured.

The violence had erupted during the protests against the Citizenship Amendment Act and the National Register of Citizens.           

The trial court dismissed the bail petition by Khalid on March 24.                  

Khalid has argued in his bail plea before the high court that his speech, which forms the basis for the allegations against him, did not call for violence, was not contemporaneously uploaded on YouTube, was not widely circulated, and that the allegation of commission of the offence of Section 124A (sedition) IPC or any reaction in Delhi on account of the speech was “unfounded, unlikely and more than remote”.            Delhi police, represented by Special Public Prosecutor Amit Prasad, has opposed the bail plea, saying the narratives sought to be created by Khalid cannot be looked into as his defence at this stage and the trial court refused to release him by a well-reasoned order which suffers from no illegality.                          

Earlier, while granting time to the Delhi Police to respond to the bail plea, the bench headed by Justice Mridul had said that Khalid’s speech was obnoxious, prima facie not acceptable, and that certain statements in the speech were “offensive per se”.

Besides Khalid, activist Khalid Saifi, JNU students Natasha Narwal and Devangana Kalita, Jamia Coordination Committee members Safoora Zargar, former AAP councillor Tahir Hussain and several others have also been booked under the stringent law in the case.



Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
 
 
 
Copyright © 2020 The Telegraph. All rights reserved.