The Supreme Court has issued a contempt notice to the director general of the Archaeological Survey of India (ASI) for failing to respond on the conservation status of 173 notified heritage sites in the national capital.

The court took strong exception to the violation of its earlier order. A bench of Justices Ahsanuddin Amanullah and N. Kotiswar Singh directed the director general of ASI to be personally present on the next date of hearing.

"The court takes strong exception to the deliberate violation of the order of this court. Accordingly, notice is issued to the Director General of the Archaeological Survey of India to showcause as to why the court may not initiate proceedings for contempt against him. He shall be personally present before the court on the next date of listing along with his show-cause," the bench said.

The court noted that the Department of Archaeology, Delhi government, has identified 19 monuments and inspected them. On most aspects, there is compliance, except for location and geo-mapping.

"However, only a general statement has been made that there has been compliance on the issues indicated in the earlier orders. We direct for a further affidavit to be filed giving details of the 19 sites which, according to the Department of Archaeology, GNCTD, comes within its jurisdiction and which have also been inspected. It shall refer to all the areas indicated in our previous orders, and also to what steps have been taken monument-wise. It should include up-to-date photographs of the sites in question," the bench said.

The court also recorded that the Municipal Corporation of Delhi has surveyed only 62 monuments out of 85 identified, and in some areas, the work is incomplete.

"Further, no details of the actual position have been brought on record. Accordingly, the direction issued in the previous paragraph to the Department of Archaeology, GNCTD, is extended to the MCD also," the bench said.

Regarding the New Delhi Municipal Corporation (NDMC), the court found that out of 54 identified monuments, only two have been surveyed.

"Learned counsel for the NDMC submits that since the 52 sites indicated in the summary of the report are lying within its jurisdiction, it has some responsibility to coordinate with the other concerned authorities, relating to their maintenance, which responsibility the NDMC shall discharge and shall not be found wanting. It is observed that whatever suggestions will come from the NDMC to actually and effectively monitor and coordinate the work between different agencies; based on the same, this Court shall issue appropriate direction to the agencies concerned, as may be required," the bench said.

The case arose from a complaint by Rajeev Suri, who raised concerns over encroachment of the Gumti of Shaikh Ali, a Lodhi-era monument in Delhi's Defence Colony.