MY KOLKATA EDUGRAPH
ADVERTISEMENT
regular-article-logo Tuesday, 30 April 2024

Fadnavis writes to Ajit Pawar opposing Nawab Malik's induction after facing Opposition heat

In his letter to Ajit Pawar, who too is a deputy CM, Fadnavis said Malik has the right to attend the assembly as an MLA and added that 'we (the BJP) do not harbour any personal animosity or grudge' against him

PTI Nagpur Published 07.12.23, 09:20 PM
Devendra Fadnavis .

Devendra Fadnavis . File picture

After coming under fire from the opposition, Maharashtra deputy Chief Minister Devendra Fadnavis on Thursday wrote to his cabinet colleague and NCP leader Ajit Pawar expressing Opposition to the induction of NCP MLA Nawab Malik, an accused in an Enforcement Directorate case, in the ruling `Maha Yuti' alliance.

Out on medical bail after the ED arrested him in February 2022 in a money-laundering probe, Malik attended the winter session of the Maharashtra legislature here for the first time on Thursday and sat on the treasury benches, indicating that he was with the Ajit Pawar-led faction of the Nationalist Congress Party.

ADVERTISEMENT

The Opposition tried to corner the BJP, which is part of the government, pointing out that it had once dubbed Malik as "traitor" (after he faced allegations of doing a land deal in Mumbai with fugitive gangster Dawood Ibrahim's aides), but now he was seen with legislators of the ruling alliance which also includes the Eknath Shinde-led Shiv Sena.

In his letter to Ajit Pawar, who too is a deputy CM, Fadnavis said Malik has the right to attend the assembly as an MLA and added that "we (the BJP) do not harbour any personal animosity or grudge" against him.

"However, considering the kind of allegations he is facing, we are of the opinion that it would not be appropriate to induct him in the Maha Yuti," the BJP leader said while also noting that Malik was out only on medical bail (and not regular bail).

"We agree that it is your prerogative (to decide) who should be inducted in your party. But every constituent party (of the Maha Yuti) has to think as to whether it would harm the alliance. Hence, we are opposed to this," Fadnavis added.

He also said that his party could not be on the same page as the "then chief minister" and the previous Maha Vikas Aghadi (MVA) government which had allowed Malik to continue as a minister even after he was arrested "on the charges of having links with anti-national elements".

Malik was a cabinet minister in the Uddhav Thackeray-led MVA government at the time of his arrest.

Shiv Sena (UBT) leader Sushama Andhare earlier took a jibe at Fadnavis, saying he could put a chameleon to shame, so fast he had changed his stand on Malik "against whom you all had taken out protest marches and disrupted the house proceedings several times (during the MVA government).” Notably, the issue of Malik joining the government side did not provoke any exchanges in the assembly, but Shiv Sena (UBT) leaders Ambadas Danve, Anil Parab and others tried to corner the government over the issue in the legislative council.

Danve, the leader of opposition in the upper house, asked how Malik, once branded as a terrorist and traitor by the BJP, was rubbing shoulders with the MLAs of the ruling alliance.

Excise minister Shambhuraj Desai of the Shinde-led Shiv Sena said Danve should not be allowed to mention the matter in the upper house.

Anil Parab countered him, saying Danve had raised the issue with the deputy chairperson's permission, and Desai had no authority to stop Danve from speaking.

This led to heated exchanges in the House.

Council deputy chairperson Neelam Gorhe said Danve could speak briefly on the issue.

Without naming Malik, Danve, said, "There is a member sitting in the lower house. The CM and Deputy CM have been saying they will never rub shoulders with someone who is a traitor. The same person who was branded as traitor could be seen rubbing shoulders with the ruling party legislators, sitting on the treasury benches. The CM and Deputy CM repeatedly made public statements about him that they could not sit with a traitor whose dealings with Dawood Ibrahim have come to light. We want to understand the government's stand." Fadnavis hit back, saying, “The Sena (UBT) leaders who initially refused to sack Malik as a minister despite he being jailed for such a serious crime have no moral right to ask this question to the BJP and the ruling alliance partners.

"We had demanded his resignation when he was put behind the bars and there was evidence that he had a terrorist connection. But the Uddhav Thackeray-led government did nothing. So you should first answer why you didn't take his resignation," the deputy CM added.

Later, Malik was seen sitting in the Ajit Pawar faction's office in the legislature complex with Anil Patil.

Anil Patil, who is the Ajit Pawar-led NCP's chief whip, said Malik himself will throw light as to which faction he was with.

“Also, our national president will tell whose side he is on," Patil added.

Ajit Pawar told reporters elsewhere that Malik would make his own decisions.

“The Speaker of the legislative assembly has the right to decide where anyone should sit in the House....Nawab Malik has come to the House, I called him in the morning,” Ajit Pawar said.

Legislature officials, meanwhile, said as the two NCP factions have not been recognised as different entities by the Speaker yet, there is no separate seating arrangement for them.

Except for the headline, this story has not been edited by The Telegraph Online staff and has been published from a syndicated feed.

Follow us on:
ADVERTISEMENT