MY KOLKATA EDUGRAPH
ADVERTISEMENT
regular-article-logo Thursday, 30 October 2025

Karnataka High Court asks Ola Electric CEO Bhavish Aggarwal to cooperate in engineer suicide probe

The deceased had allegedly left behind a death note alleging workplace harassment and denial of his salary dues and other perks by the petitioners

PTI Published 30.10.25, 02:37 PM
Bhavish Aggarwal

Bhavish Aggarwal File picture

The Karnataka High Court has directed Bhavish Aggarwal, CEO & MD of Ola Electric Technologies Private Limited, and Subrat Kumar Das—Head of Homologation Engineering —to actively cooperate in an ongoing criminal investigation into the suicide of engineer K Aravind, an employee of the company.

Justice Mohammad Nawaz on Wednesday also extended the interim protection granted to them, directing police not to harass the petitioners in the guise of investigation, till November 17. The court was hearing the petition filed by the petitioners challenging the FIR registered against them.

ADVERTISEMENT

The case stems from an FIR filed by Aravind’s brother Ashwin Kannan with the Subramanyapura police, alle­ging abetment to suicide under Section 108 of the BNS Act.

The deceased had allegedly left behind a death note alleging workplace harassment and denial of his salary dues and other perks by the petitioners.

During the hearing, the petitioners contested the authenticity of the note, arguing it might have been drafted by the complainant rather than the deceased. They also claimed the circulation of images and interviews relating to Aravind’s death had damaged the firm’s reputation, impacted its share price and triggered employee departures.

In contrast, counsel for the complainant characterized Ola Electric as being akin to the “East India Company”, accusing the firm’s officials of attempting to shift blame.

The court was told that while the police have issued notices for investigation, the petitioners have replied only with letters rather than appearing for interrogation. The court asked the petitioners to cooperate with the investigation.

The court further stated any final report filed against the petitioners can be challenged in due course.

Except for the headline, this story has not been edited by The Telegraph Online staff and has been published from a syndicated feed.

Follow us on:
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT