Trump attacks make work impossible: Barr
'It’s time to stop the tweeting about department of justice criminal cases'
- Published 15.02.20, 1:37 AM
- Updated 15.02.20, 1:37 AM
- a min read
Attorney-general William P. Barr delivered an extraordinary rebuke of President Trump on Thursday, saying that his attacks on the justice department had made it “impossible for me to do my job” and that “I’m not going to be bullied or influenced by anybody”.
Barr has been among the President’s most loyal allies and denigrated by Democrats as nothing more than his personal lawyer, but he publicly challenged Trump in a way that no sitting cabinet member has.
“Whether it’s Congress, newspaper editorial boards or the President, I’m going to do what I think is right,” Barr said in an interview with ABC News, echoing comments he made a year ago at his confirmation hearing. “I cannot do my job here at the department with a constant background commentary that undercuts me.”
Barr’s remarks were aimed at containing the fallout from the department’s botched handling of its sentencing recommendation for Trump’s longtime friend Roger J. Stone Jr, who was convicted of seven felonies in a bid to obstruct a congressional investigation that threatened the president. After career prosecutors initially recommended a sentence of seven to nine years in prison, Trump spent days attacking them, the department and the judge presiding over Stone’s case.
Such tweets “make it impossible for me to do my job and to assure the courts and the prosecutors in the department that we’re doing our work with integrity,” Barr said.
He added, “It’s time to stop the tweeting about department of justice criminal cases.”
The fallout from the Stone episode threatened to spin out of control after the four prosecutors on the case withdrew from it and Trump widened his attacks on law enforcement, thrusting Barr into a full-blown crisis.
Career prosecutors began to express worry that their work could be used to settle political scores and doubts that he could protect them from political interference.
The attorney-general had been contemplating how to respond since he became aware of Trump’s attacks on the department, according to a person familiar with his thinking.