Tesla's board has proposed an unprecedented $1 trillion compensation plan for CEO Elon Musk, putting the spotlight on Musk's hold on the electric-vehicle maker as it looks to pivot into robotaxis and humanoid robots.

The proposed plan requires boosting Tesla's valuation nearly eightfold, or about $7.5 trillion, over the next decade, and if fully earned, the award would materially increase Musk's voting power from his roughly 13% stake, intensifying debate over governance and succession.

It also highlights Tesla's reliance on Musk as it faces slowing EV demand, rising competition from Chinese car makers and pressure to deliver on its AI ambitions.

Adam Sarhan, chief executive of 50 Park Investments in New York said, "While bold compensation tied to performance is nothing new, the sheer scale here sets a new bar for CEO incentives and will dominate boardroom debates everywhere. There is significant legal and governance precedent to consider, given past scrutiny of Musk's pay (including a court voiding his prior $56 billion package), so shareholder approval and future litigation risk remain factors.

"If Musk can deliver results in line with these targets, the package could spark a new era in executive compensation, but if not, it could invite criticism about governance and pay equity."

Dan Coatsworth, investment analyst at AJ Bell said, “One minute Tesla’s board is wondering if Elon Musk is a liability to the company, the next they’re effectively saying ‘pick a number, any number’ to lock him in for as long as possible."

"A $1 trillion pay package beggars belief. Is one person worth that much? Musk is a visionary, has endless energy, and the confidence to succeed – all qualities required in leadership. But he also presides over a company that has lost its edge, is being overtaken by rivals, and whose brand has been tarnished by Musk's actions outside of Tesla. Surely Musk should be fighting for his job, not Tesla's board fighting to keep him?

"The bigger question is whether this proposal sets a new precedent and boardrooms across America will think it's ok to add a zero or two onto the end of current remuneration packages. It all seems a tad excessive and a symptom of poor corporate governance."

Xu Jiang, professor of business administration at Duke University’s Fuqua School of Business said, "While Tesla does require CEO to think big and take high-risk decisions that may not immediately bear fruit but would generate long-term value, Tesla is not the only company that requires this: pretty much every company in Magnificent Seven is of this nature, as well as some other famed startups such as OpenAI and Anthropic, so I am not sure Tesla needs to offer compensation packages that are that different from others (I get the logic that the package may be different for traditional industrial companies, though)."

Peter Andersen, founder of Andersen Capital Management, Boston said, "Investors were on the side-lines waiting for something like that to get resolved." "Long-term compensation for a founder like that is extremely important … that usually polarizes most people because some think that it is too much and is not rational while others think that it's formulaic and a founder for such a large company deserves that kind of compensation." "Would this kind of compensation increase his focus on running a singular company like Tesla because that's usually what the compensation is designed to do? … Mr. Musk has shown a troubling history of being easily distracted into other paths that don't necessarily directly benefit a company like Tesla."

Ann Lipton, a professor at the University of Colorado Law School and expert in corporate governance and corporate litigation said, "Texas allowed Tesla to amend its bylaws to block shareholder lawsuits by anyone who holds less than 3% of the company. Therefore, there will be no shareholder lawsuit, and no scrutiny along those lines. Notably, the Comptroller of the State of New York and the City of New York have included a shareholder proposal in the proxy materials to repeal that bylaw."

Art Hogan, chief market strategist at B Riley Wealth in New York said, "The shareholder base of Tesla has long been an Elon Musk fan group to the extent that anything that impaired Elon Musk from being driven to make Tesla better would be disappointing to shareholders. Elon Musk's pay package has been an issue for, you know, over a year now and you know, putting that in the rear view mirror is obviously going to be a positive."