The Telegraph
Since 1st March, 1999
Email This PagePrint This Page
UK court breather to airlines blamed for blood-clot deaths

London, Dec. 20 (Reuters): A London court blocked an attempt today by victims of “economy class syndrome” to sue airlines over claims that cramped seating on long flights gave them potentially deadly blood clots.

In a ruling with important implications for airlines worldwide, the high court said blood clots did not constitute an “accident” under the Warsaw Convention.

The 1929 treaty makes airlines liable for damages only in the case of an accident.

The decision, which ran counter to a ruling made earlier today in a similar case in Australia, was based on reasoning by Justice Robert Nelson that an “accident” was an unexpected and unusual event “external to the passenger”.

“There was no unexpected or unusual event or happening,” the judge said.

“DVT cannot be regarded as anything other than a serious personal injury, leading, as unhappily on occasion it does, to death.”

Victims have until January 28 to appeal the decision which for some families will involve finding the money to continue.

“We’ve got to find the finances now to take this forward, and we will,” said Ruth Christophersen, whose 28-year-old daughter, Emma, died on a flight from Australia to the UK in September 2000.

“When we heard the ruling, we were disappointed,” she said. “Not just for myself but for all the people around the world waiting with baited breath on the outcome of this.”

The case was launched by 55 victims and their families against 27 airlines, including Europe’s biggest, British Airways, and Europe-based rivals KLM Royal Dutch and Virgin Atlantic.

Major US carriers — American Airlines, United Airlines, Delta Airlines and Northwest Airlines — were named in the suit, as were Japan Airlines, Qantas Airways Ltd and Singapore Airlines.

The judgment sided with airlines which had argued that deep vein thrombosis (DVT) was not a flying disease and not an accident under the Warsaw Convention.

Earlier during the day, an Australian court took the opposite view and gave the green light to a lawsuit there against Qantas and British Airways over a blood clot suffered by a passenger on a long flight.

“Once we heard the ruling in Australia this morning we felt quite upbeat,” Christophersen said. “We thought a judge in one country can’t make a different ruling to a judge in another, surely... but they can and they have.”

BA expressed sympathy in a statement but stood by its view that the disease was not linked to air travel.

“British Airways sympathises with all victims of DVT but, since the World Health Organisation and the House of Lords agree that there is no evidence of a specific link that flying causes DVT, any further claims will continue to be resisted.”

The world’s largest carrier, American Airlines, a division of AMR Corp, last week reached an out-of-court settlement in a blood clot case.

Airlines and blood-clot victims around the world will be watching eagerly for any rulings in the US, where courts hand out the richest damages in the world.

Email This PagePrint This Page