TT Epaper
The Telegraph
Graphiti
 
IN TODAY'S PAPER
WEEKLY FEATURES
CITIES AND REGIONS
ARCHIVES
Since 1st March, 1999
 
THE TELEGRAPH
 
 
CIMA Gallary

GLOBAL CHANGE

You know the story-line by now. There are one million US-dollar millionaires in China. Seventy per cent of the homes in China are bought for cash. China’s total trade — the sum of imports and exports — is now bigger than that of the United States of America. “They’re going to eat our lunch,” whimper the faint-hearted in the West. It’s not just the Chinese who are coming. The Indians and the Brazilians are coming too, with economic growth rates far higher than those in the old industrialized countries, but it doesn’t even stop there. There’s also Mexico, Turkey, Indonesia and half a dozen other big countries in what used to be called the Third World that have discovered the secret of high-speed growth. The power shift is happening even faster than the pundits predicted.

As recently as 2009, the ‘BRIC’ (Brazil, Russia, India and China) accounted for less than one-tenth of total global consumption. The European Union consumed twice as much, and so did the US. But by 2020, the BRICS (South Africa was included in the association in 2010) will be producing and consuming just as much as either of the older economic zones. In fact, if you include not just the five BRICS but all the other fast-growing economies of the ex-Third World, in just a dozen years’ time they will account for around 40 per cent of world consumption. As a rule, with wealth comes power, so they will increasingly be calling the tune that the West must dance to. Or at least that is the doomsday scenario that haunts the strategists of the West. It’s nonsense, for at least three reasons.

Firstly, a shift in the world’s centre of economic gravity does not necessarily spell doom for those whose relative influence has dwindled. The last time the centre shifted, when the US overtook the nations of Europe in the late 19th and early 20th centuries, it did not dent Europe’s prosperity at all.

Real answer

Secondly, the new centre of gravity this time, while mostly located in Asia, is not a single country with a coherent foreign policy like the US. The five BRICS will never become a strategic or economic bloc. They are more likely to split into rival blocs, although one hopes not. And the Mexicos and Turkeys and Indonesias of this new world will have their own fish to fry. So it will be a more complicated world with many major players, and the centre of economic gravity will be in Asia, but there’s nothing particularly strange about this. More than half of the human race lives in Asia, so where else should the centre of gravity be? Asia is very far from monolithic, and there is no logical reason to suppose that its economic rise spells economic decline for the West.

Thirdly, descriptions of the future that are simply extrapolations of the present, like the ones at the start of this article, are almost always wrong. If the widely believed forecasts of the 1980s had been right, Japan would now bestride the world like an economic Colossus. The one certain thing about the future is surprises — but some surprises are a little less surprising than others.

Take climate change, for example. The scientific evidence strongly suggests that the tropical and sub-tropical parts of the world, home to almost all of the emerging economic powers, will be much harder hit by global warming than the temperate parts of the globe, farther away from the equator, where the older industrialized countries all live.

The centre of gravity of the world economy is undoubtedly moving towards Asia, but how far and how fast this process goes remains to be seen. True, economists in the West often ask the question: “what will we sell the emerging countries in the future that they cannot produce for themselves?” In the global warming scenario, the answer would be “food”, but the real answer is sure to be more complex than that. Never mind. They’ll think of something, because they’ll have to.