TT Epaper
The Telegraph
 
  This website is ACAP-enabled
IN TODAY'S PAPER
WEEKLY FEATURES
CITIES AND REGIONS
ARCHIVES
Since 1st March, 1999
 
THE TELEGRAPH
 
Calcutta Weather
WeatherTemperature
Min : 25.70°C (+0)
Max : 32.10°C (+0)
Rainfall : 2.40 mm
Relative Humidity:
Max : 98.00% Min : 74.00%
Sunrise : 5:23 AM
Sunset : 5:45 PM
Today
Rain or thundershower may occur in some areas. Maximum temperature likely to be around 33°C.
 
CIMA Gallary
Advertisement

SC refuses to frame guide to court reporting, but will allow delayed publication

New Delhi, Sep 11 (PTI): The Supreme Court on Tuesday refused to frame guidelines across the board for reporting sub-judice matters but laid down a constitutional principle under which aggrieved parties can seek postponement of publication of court hearings.

A five-judge bench headed by Chief Justice S H Kapadia said it was laying down the constitutional principle, which will allow the aggrieved parties to seek from appropriate court the postponement of the publication of court hearings.

The bench said the concerned court will decide the question of postponement of reporting court proceedings on case-by-case basis.

”We are not framing guidelines but we have laid down constitutional principle and appropriate writ courts will decide when the postponement order has to be passed on case-by -case basis,” the bench also comprising justices D K Jain, S S Nijjar, Ranjana Prakash Desai and J S Khehar said.

”Hence, guidelines on media reporting cannot be framed across the board,” the bench said.        While propounding the doctrine of postponement of publication of court proceedings, the bench said it is a preventive measure and not a prohibitive and punitive measure.

It further said that temporary ban on publication of court proceedings is necessary to maintain balance between freedom of speech and fair trial for proper administration of justice.

The bench said the postponement of publication of court proceedings would be required where there is a substantial risk of prejudicing the trial and administration of justice.

Further the CJI, who read the judgement, said reasonable restrictions on reporting of court proceedings were needed for societal interest and this doctrine of postponement is one of ”neutralising technique”.        

The apex court has undertaken the exercise of framing guidelines after receiving complaints of breach of confidentiality during the hearing of a dispute between Sahara Group and market regulator the Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI).

The issue of breach of confidentiality came up when certain documents regarding the dispute between Sahara and SEBI were leaked to the media.


 More stories in Front Page

  • Yuvi shows will to fight
  • Mulayam says Cong scam-tainted Samajwadi ministers 'clean'; sees big role after 2014
  • Teenager raped in Delhi
  • Minister, our lamps are on the blink
  • Hospital sans fire safety nod
  • People's say in coal must
  • Higher bonus hope in estates
  • Uneasy calm in Kudankulam; protesters on relay fast
  • Couple allege rape in heart of Durgapur
  • Court extends JC of Kanda, Chaddha through video conference
  • Plan to attack police academy: Court gives ATS custody of Jundal till Sept 24
  • Supreme Court tells Vectra chief Rishi to move trial court against look-out notice
  • SC refuses to frame guide to court reporting, but will allow delayed publication
  • Predators in the prime of youth