TT Epaper
The Telegraph
You
 
  This website is ACAP-enabled
IN TODAY'S PAPER
WEEKLY FEATURES
CITIES AND REGIONS
ARCHIVES
Since 1st March, 1999
 
THE TELEGRAPH
 
Calcutta Weather
WeatherTemperature
Min : 27.90°C (+2)
Max : 34.10°C (+2)
Rainfall : 0.00 mm
Relative Humidity:
Max : 91.00% Min : 70.00%
Sunrise : 6:23 AM
Sunset : 5:3 PM
Today
One or two spells of rain or thundershower may occur. Maximum temperature likely to be around 33°C.
 
CIMA Gallary
Advertisement

Court notice to cricket bosses and Bollywood stars over IPL-V dances

Madurai, Jul 18 (PTI): A Madras High Court bench here on Wednesday ordered notice to Indian cricket board chief N Srinivasan, Bollywood stars Amitabh Bachchan, Salman Khan and Kareena Kapoor on a petition regarding alleged “uncensored and indecent” dance programmes during the IPL-V inaugural show in Chennai in April 2012.        

Justice A Selvam also ordered notice to Bollywood actress Priyanka Chopra, Indian Premier League chairman Rajeev Shukla, American pop star Katy Perry, Australian cricketer and Chennai Super Kings member Douglas Bolinger and a Sony Set Max TV official.        

Petitioner K Jebakumar, an advocate, alleged that the entire IPL inaugural show, held at the YMCA grounds in Chennai on April 3, 2012 and attended by women and children also, was ”obscene and lascivious, appealing to prurient interest.”        

He sought a direction to the state Director General of Police to register a case on the basis of his complaint and take further action in accordance with law.        

He claimed the inaugural programme was telecast live uncensored by Sony Set Max TV for BCCI and IPL. Photographs and video clippings of the show were published/telecast by newspapers and TV channels causing distraction to students who were taking examinations at that time, he contended.        

The petitioner submitted the celebrities and dignitaries had committed offences under various India Penal Code sections and also act such as Indecent Representation of Women (Prohibition) Act, Young Persons Harmful Publications Act, Foreigners Act.        

When the petition came up for hearing, petitioner's counsel Peter Ramesh Kumar said despite a complaint lodged by his client with IGPs of Central and South Zone, no action had been taken on it.        

”Why this inaction? (on the complaint filed by the petitioner)?” the Judge asked and posted the case to July 31.


 More stories in Front Page

  • Inflation? Splitting hair is more easy
  • Court notice to cricket bosses and Bollywood stars over IPL-V dances
  • Editor quits, Akhil harps on conspiracy
  • High court slaps fine on chief secy
  • Mock vote favours Pranab
  • Didi's pain, dada's pleasure
  • Rajesh Khanna, Bollywood's first Superstar, passes away
  • CM pushes for city police commissioner
  • SC to hear all aspects of Presidential reference in 2G case first
  • If you can't beat 'em…
  • Forward Contract Act amendment bill back before Cabinet – without changes
 
 
 
" "