TT Epaper
The Telegraph
 
IN TODAY'S PAPER
WEEKLY FEATURES
CITIES AND REGIONS
ARCHIVES
Since 1st March, 1999
 
THE TELEGRAPH
 
 
CIMA Gallary

Frown but no fine on original wardrobe malfunction

Washington, June 29 (Reuters): The US Supreme Court today let stand a lower court decision to throw out a federal agency’s $550,000 indecency fine against CBS Corp for airing singer Janet Jackson’s “wardrobe malfunction” during the 2004 Super Bowl broadcast.

Jackson’s right breast was briefly exposed to almost 90 million TV viewers after singer Justin Timberlake ripped off part of her bustier during a halftime show performance. CBS was fined $27,500 for each of the 20 stations it owned.

The justices, in a brief order, rejected an appeal by the Federal Communications Commission, declining to review a ruling by a US appeals court based in Philadelphia that held the FCC had acted arbitrarily and capriciously in imposing the fine.

Chief Justice John Roberts agreed with the denial of the appeal. But he wrote briefly and said that even if the appeals court was wrong in its ruling in the CBS case, the FCC has clarified its indecency policy since the Janet Jackson incident.

“It is now clear that the brevity of an indecent broadcast — be it word or image — cannot immunise it from FCC censure,” Roberts wrote.

He said Timberlake and Jackson “strained the credulity of the public by terming the episode a “wardrobe malfunction” and added: “As every school child knows, a picture is worth a thousand words, and CBS broadcast this particular picture to millions of impressionable children.”

The Supreme Court rejected the FCC’s appeal in the CBS case after its June 21 ruling in two separate cases that went against the FCC’s crackdown on broadcast profanity and nudity. The FCC stepped up its indecency crackdown after the Janet Jackson incident, which drew half a million complaints to the agency.

 
 
" "