TT Epaper
The Telegraph
 
 
IN TODAY'S PAPER
WEEKLY FEATURES
CITIES AND REGIONS
ARCHIVES
Since 1st March, 1999
 
THE TELEGRAPH
 
CIMA Gallary
 
Email This Page
‘If Advaniji’s authority had not been undermined, the BJP would be in power today’
Tête à tête

This isn’t quite the time to ask Sudheendra Kulkarni when he’s going to write the book in him. The man who spent six years with a Prime Minister, and several years before and after with a would-be Prime Minister, has a bestseller inside him that’s waiting to explode. But writing a book, as he knows well, is not quite the safest of occupations these days in some political quarters. And certainly not in the party he has just bid goodbye to.

A few days after former minister Jaswant Singh was expelled from the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) for writing a book on Jinnah and praising him, former journalist Kulkarni — a faithful aide of BJP strongmen Lal Krishna Advani and Atal Behari Vajpayee — reluctantly walked out of his party of 13 years.

“My leaving had nothing to do with Jaswant Singhji’s expulsion,” Kulkarni, 52, stresses. “I had been thinking about it for a while. About three weeks ago I met Advaniji and communicated my decision to him. I came to this decision because I realised I cannot make any meaningful contribution to the party any more.”

He is being interviewed in The Telegraph office in New Delhi, for Kulkarni no longer has an office to call his own. He has come in an autorickshaw, because the taxi that he had hired failed to turn up in the morning. But then the man with a receding hairline and mane of white, cotton-like hair has always been the quiet and modest voice of the party on television. In debates, when others foamed and frothed, Kulkarni never raised his voice, and seldom spoke in hyperboles. Even now, his thoughts are carefully masked, and he measures his words before he speaks.

“I really don’t want to leave the party by pointing fingers,” he says. “The party has given me so much. It is because of the party that I could do my little contribution to public life.”

He is firm that he is not going to join any political party and laughs off rumours that he is edging towards the Nationalist Congress Party. “No, I am not joining any party. But now that I am out of the BJP I’ll work with people across the spectrum.”

He is now on an expert committee set up by Trinamul leader and railway minister Mamata Banerjee on railway expansion and modernisation. “I have been a great admirer of Mamata Banerjee. I worked closely with her when she was railway minister in Vajpayeeji’s government. So when she asked me to be a part of this committee, I said, yes.”

His opponents in politics — and there are quite a few, many in the BJP — stress that it’s not difficult to think of him in another political outfit, for Kulkarni has veered sharply from the left to the right, and is seen within the BJP as someone who switched loyalties from Advani to Vajpayee, and back to Advani.

“People often ask me, You were a communist once, and with the BJP later. And now I am out of the BJP. But I think at every point I have tried to be true to myself. I think there is still a communist in me,” he says. “I cannot disown my past.”

The past, clearly, has been anything but monotonous. The son of an agriculturist, he grew up in a small town in north Karnataka, and then joined the Indian Institute of Technology, Bombay, in the mid seventies. But when his fellow students made plans for the future, Kulkarni flirted with the Left. When they left for the United States for jobs, he joined a science magazine. And later, when they went up the ladder, Kulkarni worked with the trade union wing of the Communist Party of India (Marxist) in Karnataka.

The first time he met CPI(M) politburo member Sitaram Yechury was at a Students’ Federation of India conference in Mumbai. Yechury was the SFI president, Kulkarni a volunteer. “I also met Prakash Karat on a few occasions. I have great admiration for them. Sometimes I bump into them,” he says.

But the two contemporary leaders he respects the most are Advani and Vajpayee. Advani influenced him into embracing the party in 1996, but Vajpayee persuaded him to join the Prime Minister’s Office when he became the Prime Minister in 1998.

“Atalji said, you have to be in the PMO. I replied, but Advaniji has asked me to work with him in the ministry. Atalji said, I’ll talk to him, but you have to work here. So he spoke to him, and I worked there.”

That surprised quite a few, for Advani and Vajpayee are seen as representatives of two vastly different and often bickering camps. But Kulkarni believes that while the two had differences, they complemented each other. “Neither believed in forming camps. And that’s why they worked together for so long,” he says, and suggests, with words that peter out, that others in the party may have encouraged factionalism. “It may have been possible that some people… It always happens. Power attracts people of various natures.”

The two, he stresses, were different — and had their differences. “But that’s nature’s architecture — every human being is unique. The beauty is how they complemented each other’s strengths. And they knew how to resolve differences.”

Kulkarni is out of the party, but the party, clearly, is not out of him yet. The former national secretary has a blueprint for the BJP, revolving around the two leaders he reveres. To begin with, he believes the party has to resurrect Advani’s role that has diminished considerably in recent years. “Restore the authority of Advaniji — he alone can guide this party out of the crisis.”

He also wants the party to go back to what he calls Vajpayeeism. “Atalji had a very broad vision but his feet were on the ground. He was a great resolver of issues. His political vision embraced the diversity of India. The BJP must similarly embrace the diversity of India, must become an inclusive party”

And there is another demand — Jaswant Singh’s expulsion must be revoked: “He did no wrong. He has not deified Jinnah, nor demonised Sardar Patel.”

That’s a tall order for a party that’s seemingly on a hara kiri mission. “But there is no other way for the party to overcome this crisis. The BJP has a high level of internal democracy but in the absence of a unified command this internal democracy can turn into its weakness, which it has today. It shows in the kind of drift that has taken place in the party,” he says.

The drift, as he calls it, should upset Kulkarni, for he left the CPI(M) because he thought he could see communism crumble. A great supporter of Gorbachev — he was in Russia in 1985 for a world youth conference inaugurated by the last Soviet leader — he remembers the moment that shook the world. Kulkarni was in Uttarkashi, on a visit with his family to four pilgrimage spots in the Himalayas, called Char Dham, when Gorbachev was ousted, and the Soviet Union fell.

“In Char Dham, there is something that seeps into you. Take the temple at Kedarnath. The priest is always a Malayali. The temple was established by the Shankaracharya. Someone from Kerala, so many hundred years ago, goes on a yatra from the south to the north. He goes to Kedarnath, sets up a temple; he goes to Dwarka, to Puri. This is how India was unified.”

That was, for him, the turning point. You have to look within for answers, Kulkarni thought. The BJP was on the rise then, and he was drawn to it. And the one-time trade unionist and journalist (he was with The Daily in Mumbai and later the executive editor of Blitz) left journalism in a few years to move to Delhi. He was with Advani during his ‘Swarna Jayanti Yatra’ on India’s 50th year of independence. He was in the BJP’s 2004 election committee and with Advani’s campaign group in 2009.

“In retrospect I believe that the lessons of the 2004 defeat were not learnt, and this was one of the reasons for our subsequent defeat in 2009. And I am sure if Advaniji’s authority had not been undermined in 2005, the BJP would be in power today.”

In 2005, Kulkarni accompanied Advani to Pakistan where the BJP president praised Jinnah — leading to a loud outcry in his party which ended with Advani’s resignation. Kulkarni — who, as the two leaders’ speech writer, turned their thoughts into writings — was blamed for the Jinnah episode. “When many in the party started pointing fingers at me, I resigned. I didn’t resume my membership of the party after that, but I continued as a full-time activist. I haven’t done anything other than party work for these 13 years.”

Now Kulkarni hopes to build a consensus on national issues cutting across parties, and to focus on good governance. “There are good people in all political parties, outside the political system — we need greater dialogue, greater cooperation.” And he wants to be part of an effort that promotes Hindu-Muslim unity.

Kulkarni looks like he is carrying a heavy burden on his shoulder. But he won’t divulge the last straw that broke his back. “I don't want to talk about it now,” he says. For that, we’ll have to wait for the book.

Top
Email This Page