TT Epaper
The Telegraph
 
 
IN TODAY'S PAPER
WEEKLY FEATURES
CITIES AND REGIONS
ARCHIVES
Since 1st March, 1999
 
THE TELEGRAPH
 
CIMA Gallary
 
Email This Page
Misguided nostalgia for XP
The Apple MacBook with the latest Intel Core 2 Duo processor

By the strictest definition, Windows XP has been dead since January 30, 2007 末 the day its replacement, Windows Vista, arrived in stores and XP promptly vanished from most new computers.

And yet by other measures, XP appears quite alive.

Vista’s issues -末 its steep hardware requirements, its strict anti-piracy measures, its sometimes-intrusive security measures, its incompatibility with some older products 末 have given XP not only a second life in the market but also a newly vocal and enthusiastic fan base.

Boxed copies still sell briskly. A fortnight ago, US trade analysts said that from 2007 through the first quarter of 2008, 87 million copies of XP had been sold worldwide, compared with 132 million copies of Vista.

Computer manufacturers have responded by bundling XP on some of their units and selling “downgrades” to XP on others. Business and government users, critical members of Microsoft’s customer base, have resisted Vista strongly enough to force Microsoft to push its deadline for retailers and computer vendors to drop XP from January 30 to June 30.

But XP holdouts haven’t only voted with their credit cards, they’ve also put their names on a “Save Windows XP” petition, hosted by the tech magazine InfoWorld, that urges Microsoft to offer XP “indefinitely” (savexp.com). Some XP fans have gone further, asking Microsoft to abandon Vista outright.

It can be heartwarming to see this display of adoration.

But when you consider how much affection XP drew as Microsoft’s flagship product, this worship looks ridiculous. Vista has problems, but reverting to XP won’t solve most of them.

There’s a lot to be said for keeping XP on an existing machine instead of upgrading to Vista; things are much cheaper and simpler that way. People running specialised software packages often have other reasons to stick with XP.

But it’s another thing to say that on a new home computer, Vista is so unacceptable for mainstream use that you’d be better off with its predecessor.

XP had enough problems at its October 2001 debut, starting with weak security and inadequate tools for organising your information, and the Internet has only gotten busier and more brutish since then. Even with all of Microsoft’s patches 末 including XP’s third major Service Pack update 末 and the prospect of continued security fixes through April 2014, keeping XP running safely and reliably requires a host of add-on security and Internet programs to paper over its faults.

XP is not something that needs to be “saved”, as if it were some architectural triumph in need of historic preservation.

True, Windows Vista shares many of XP’s faults. It can become as ungovernable as XP 末 which is another way of saying that most of the things people hate about Vista happen in XP, too.

And that, in turn, helps explain why Apple is selling so many Macs.

But at least Vista needs less tinkering and reinforcement out of the box than XP. For all the people who never touch default settings, that matters more than how an expert might fine-tune XP.

In some aspects, the worst part of the transition to Vista is over. This software has seen numerous bug fixes, including a Service Pack in March that curbed its widely hated anti-piracy defences. Most third-party developers who hadn’t updated their software for Vista have fixed their products by now.

If you’re unhappy about Vista, don’t get sucked in by the misguided nostalgia for XP. Root for the success of non-Windows computers. Or buy one yourself. Nothing attracts a company’s attention like taking your business elsewhere.

The Washington Post

Top
Email This Page