|
|
| (Top)Abhishek Bachchan
and Aishwarya Rai in Guru, releasing this Friday |
You have shot just three films (Bombay, Morning
Raga and Guru) and directed two movies (Sapnay
and Kandukondain Kandukondain) in over 12 years.
Why?
I’ve underperformed (laughs)!
See I also run an advertising concern in Chennai and so
don’t have the chance to do so many films. Also, for me
to shoot a film there has to be a certain level of understanding
with the director. The aesthetics have to match and we have
to get along. Also, I take time to write my own films. Then
again, not many people have approached me to shoot their
films. And whichever happened kept getting postponed.
So how did Guru happen, more than a decade after
you shot Bombay for Mani Ratnam?
Mani and I were doing a stage
show on 50 years of Tamil cinema. We were working with a
lot of old pictures and footage and it was then that we
decided to do a period film together. That eventually became
Guru.
How much has Mani changed
in all these years?
There’s hardly any change at all
in him. Working with Mani was as fine this time as it was
so many years back. Of course he is now more exposed to
cinema. Also, we have lot more of technology at our disposal
today than we had 10 years back. So, we both have tried
to optimise our visualisation keeping the available technology
in mind.
Has the visual language also
changed in these 10 years?
Today, more shots count
for than it did before. The concept of starting with an
establishing shot and then going into a mid-shot is all
gone. It is a day and age of minimalisation, of simplicity.
Everything is more precise, more focused. You can’t take
a single shot just for the sake of beauty.
How difficult was it to create
1950s Mumbai for Guru?
It was all digitally created but
you won’t understand that when you watch the film. Like
the 1950s Marine Drive shown in the film is actually the
seaface of Pondicherry. We shot in Pondicherry and put the
Marine Drive picture plate in the background. We researched
a lot about that period and Sharda Dwivedi’s books on Mumbai
helped us a lot.
The many websites on the history
of Mumbai have lots of information, which helped us in lighting
the scenes. Like the fact that mercury vapour lamps were
used in the streets only after 1968. Before that they used
gas. So rather than blue we used a yellow glow for those
scenes. Also, the lights used inside homes were more diffused
while those used in offices was very Art Deco with
stronger shadows. We all hope that with Guru we will
be able to raise the bar, technically, for Indian films.
What have you done with the
colour scheme?
We had to shoot in Turkey and
India. We wanted people to really feel the colours when
we show India. So for Turkey we went for a very desaturated
look to give it a cold feel. We shot in March and exploited
the cloudy weather there. Our bible was an interesting book
by a Turkish photographer named Ira Uhler — the Cartier-Bresson
of Turkey — which has a lot of black-and-white photographs
of the country.
For the India leg we chose a village
in northern Karnataka named Badami, near Hampi. It was an
early Chalukya capital and has beautiful rock cut caves
of red sandstone. So we could start from that red and then
move on to green. The 1970s portions also have a lot of
tube light and so there’s blue too.
What was the plan in terms
of camera movement?
There’s a lot of handheld camera
in Guru’s initial years of struggle. Then as he ages
and becomes powerful, we have used a lot of dolly movements.
It’s like, by then, the camera starts obeying him rather
than countering him. Since the film is essentially about
faces, how they change in fear, hope, anger, greed, we have
used a lot of close-ups. But we had to keep in mind that
too many of them can make it a TV serial.
|
| Rajiv Menon |
During your preparation which
are the films you looked at for possible inspiration for
the look of Guru?
Road To Perdition in a
big way, where Conrad Hall won the Best Cinematographer
Oscar. Then we looked a lot into Christopher Doyle’s work
in In The Mood For Love in the way he has used hard
light. And finally, for the wide angles, the look is very
Amelie. You know the exuberance in the lensing gives
a very hip-hop feel to the images.
Did you do a lot of storyboarding
for the film?
Not really, apart from some important
scenes which we call flag-off scenes. In a biopic like Guru,
we have to flag scenes where he starts growing as a person
and where he starts changing from within. So we flagged
key shots in Turkey, 1970s Mumbai, the AGMs held in stadiums.
Apart from that Mani doesn’t want
to do storyboarding. His style of working is very organic.
He goes to the location, gets his actors, decides the lens,
looks at his eyepiece and starts blocking, and then the
shooting follows.
Finally, do you think that
Mani Ratnam will be able to break his Bollywood jinx with
Guru?
I believe Guru will get
him some maryada. The way he has gone into the interiors
of the human relationship is quite something. I have always
felt that Satyajit Ray was the master when it came to showing
post-marriage relationship on screen, in films like Apur
Sansar, Charulata and Mahanagar. After
him comes Mani. |