|
Washington, Sept. 14: On
July 28, exactly a week after Antaryami, Tilak Raj and Sukhdev
Singh were taken hostage in Iraq, South Block was jolted
into the realisation that it could no longer continue to
act like Nero.
It had to stop fiddling. Iraq
was burning. So would the three Indian truckers unless more
was done ?- and done quickly.
The government was forced into
action when B.B. Tyagi, the Indian ambassador, told the
ministry of external affairs (MEA) that on that day kidnappers
had executed a Pakistani engineer and his compatriot driver,
freeing an Iraqi who was also taken hostage with the two
Pakistanis.
The next day, India issued a
travel advisory against its citizens travelling to Iraq.
Shyam Saran, who was to take charge as new foreign secretary
in four days, has been pressing E. Ahmed, South Block?s
junior minister at the centre of the crisis, that India
should depute a special envoy to Baghdad to get to grips
directly with the problem.
On July 31, Talmiz Ahmad, India?s
ambassador in Muscat was sent to Baghdad to take up that
role. It made no sense for India to continue to insist that
it would not talk to the captors of the three Indians.
When an Indian Airlines plane
was hijacked at Christmas time in 1999 and eventually taken
to Kandahar, did anyone insist that no talks would be held
with the hijackers?
Or, for that matter, would fuel
have been refused for a hijacked plane running low on fuel
on the ground that it was against policy to talk to terrorists?
These arguments by officials who
disagreed with the strategy thus far to free the three Indians
carried weight and prodded the government into action.
The execution of the two Pakistanis
had an effect similar to the killing of Rupin Katyal, a
passenger on board the Indian Airlines plane hijacked in
1999. It suddenly dawned on the crisis management group
that history could revisit them after almost five years.
The episode was a reminder of
how much Pakistan is a factor in any aspect of Indian diplomacy
that it was the execution of two Pakistanis that finally
prompted the government to take another look at its strategy
in the hostage crisis.
As usual, there was no shortage
of conspiracy theorists in South Block who insisted that
since the two Pakistanis had been killed, Islamabad would
play dirty and do what it can to see that the three Indians
do not get out of their ordeal alive.
Once ambassador Ahmad got to Baghdad,
secured the services of his trusted translator Zikr-ur-Rahman
and Saran assumed charge as foreign secretary, these three
men were at the core of the efforts to free the truckers.
The crisis Management group continued
to be the public face that dealt with the problem, leaving
these three men to do what they thought was best with just
one aim in mind: take the three Indians back home alive.
The first thing that Ahmad and
Rahman went about doing in Baghdad was to find alternatives
to Sheikh Hisham al-Dulami, who had acquired a copyright
of sorts in getting hostages freed in Iraq where no one?s
writ ran in much of the country. It was good business for
the ?good Samaritan? sheikh.
Ahmad and Rahman realised by the
time they entered the picture that the entire negotiations
between the sheikh and Kuwait Gulf Link (KGL), employers
of the truckers, had been reduced to nothing but money.
The sheikh was interested in how
much money could be extracted from KGL and the company was
merely looking for ways to put this crisis behind them so
that they could continue to mint money from transport contracts
in Iraq.
Ahmad dug into his extensive contacts
in the region, including some in Iraq dating back more than
25 years when he was a second secretary at the Indian embassy
in Baghdad and India was a trusted friend of the Iraqis.
They found new Iraqi negotiators
who were willing to work for the freedom of the three Indians
without any motive of profit. Rahman was tasked to follow
up and act on these new tracks of negotiations.
But there was a new problem. KGL
was unwilling, at any cost, to give up its contracts in
Iraq.
Swashpawan Singh, the Indian ambassador
in Kuwait, was given the task of securing a commitment from
KGL that it would at least issue a statement of intent to
stop trucking to Iraq.
He was also given the brief to
negotiate with KGL the amount it would pay as ransom. Neither
task was easy. Singh was second secretary in Kabul just
before the Soviet invasion of Afghanistan and handled that
country from New Delhi in the tumultuous days after the
invasion.
He put to use some of the lessons
learned from those years.
Through a combination of threats,
inducements and appeals, Singh got KGL to declare an end
to its business in Iraq and ensured that half a million
dollars was paid to secure freedom for the three Indians.
When the three Indian drivers
landed in Delhi and were met by the minister of state for
external affairs at the airport, the first thing one of
the freed Indians said was that they were thankful to Rahman.
Most of those in the receiving party did not grasp what
he said. Some interpreted it as a variation of thanking
God in Arabic. It was a tribute to the MEA translator who
actually negotiated their freedom after a 42-day ordeal
even though South Block continues to insist that it never
talked to the hostage-takers.
|