|
| Mayavati at a news
conference in New Delhi. (PTI file picture) |
The Madhya Pradesh Assembly elections
of 2003 may well prove a turning point in one respect. They
will demonstrate whether the Mayavati-led Bahujan Samaj
Party will successfully emerge as a decisive force in the
central Indian state.
In 1998, the Congress beat the
BJP by 2 per cent, but netted a comfortable majority. The
BSP had cornered 6 per cent of the votes. A cent per cent
addition of the Congress and the BSP votes, a near impossible
task, would have wiped the BJP off the map.
In fact, the devil is in the detail.
The 1998 polls saw the BSP contest only 121 seats, but in
these it managed to corner more than one in 10 votes.
These hold the key if — and only
if — the party manages to transfer its votes.
Mayavati will also have to contain
any damage by Phool Singh Baraiya of Gwalior, the former
state unit chief who has parted company. Gwalior lies in
the Vindhya Pradesh region. It is here and in Madhya Bharat
that the BSP has actually grown into a formidable force.
In addition to Dalit youths, it has managed to reach out
to sections of the backward classes.
These are all part of the Congress’
traditional vote bank and any accord with the BSP, however
partial, will take the heat off the ruling party. There
is ample scope of a tie-up on the ground. The BSP won seven
seats and came second in 11. These 15-20 seats may well
be no-go zones for the Congress.
The BSP in turn may be willing
to pull out in about 40 seats. Here, it polled less than
5 per cent of the votes, or finished in fourth or fifth
place. Its own votes would not be sufficient to build a
base for victory. But they could be critical in ensuring
the party falls in line with its leader Mayavati’s newfound
dictum: defeat the BJP at all costs.
Hurdles remain, especially in
the 58 seats where the smaller party finished in third spot.
It is here that there will be a lot of hard bargains to
be done. It is only by contesting more seats that it can
hope to increase its MLAs.
Ideally, the party would like
to have the Congress reliant on the BSP to form and run
a government. Power can only come within its grasp if Mayavati
can play kingmaker.
But the Congress in turn is no
pushover. It would try bowing to the smaller party but only
up to a point. The Congress would hope to win a secure majority
but draw in the BSP to beat back its arch rival. If the
BSP gets more seats in the bargain, it is fine by the Congress.
But the fragmentation of the polity beyond a point will
also harm the Congress’ prospects in Madhya Pradesh in the
long run.
Unlike in Uttar Pradesh or Bihar,
the party has been alert to the aspiration of Dalits. The
Dalit Agenda two years ago has been followed by the largest
land reform programme in any north Indian state. This makes
any tie-up with a Dalit- led party of a finite nature.
There is a meeting of minds at
the juncture due to the bitterness in the BSP leadership
after the recent break-up with the BJP in neighbouring Uttar
Pradesh. This has given the Congress just the chance it
was looking for.
There is still a hint of anxiety
about an open alliance. The reasons are both tactical and
strategic. In 1993, an alliance in Uttar Pradesh brought
little cheer to the Congress and actually contributed to
erosion in its ranks. Local leaders denied tickets had little
incentive to stay on in the party.
In Madhya Pradesh, the party is
far stronger than in Uttar Pradesh. After all, it has been
in power for all but four years since 1980 when led back
to office by Arjun Singh.
The problem is that the Congress
is a multi-class, umbrella party that cannot afford to lose
out on the support of the upper castes and the Other Backward
Classes. It is still unclear whether they will vote for
a BSP candidate or not.
An open alliance would actually
enable the BJP to reap the benefits of an anti-Dalit backlash.
It is to avoid this that Mayavati and Digvijay both favour
a tacit accord to an open alliance.
It is still too early to say whether
this move can ensure another spell in power for the Congress.
The fact is, the election is being
fought on caste and community lines. Unlike in his first
term, the chief minister is not confident of banking on
his record of governance. This has opened up space for ties
with the BSP. These may well see a sea change in state politics
with the advent of a third force in electoral politics.
|