|
|
| Double-edged |
The other day a packet arrived
in the mail from Pakistan. It weighed in excess of a kilogram;
but the return address assured me that it was not a bomb
but a book. It had been sent by the Karachi branch of the
Oxford University Press who, in recent years, have published
a series of fine works on the history and politics of Pakistan.
This one, however, was something else: an autobiography
of the great Sindh, Sussex and Glamorgan cricketer, Javed
Miandad.
Miandad is a Mohajir whose family
came originally from Gujarat. His father worked as a policeman
in Ahmedabad before Partition. More to the point, he was
a keen cricketer, and after moving to Karachi ran a popular
sports club. Javed was one of six children, four of them
boys. He played with his siblings and on the street before
graduating to club cricket. He came to maturity early. At
the age of 16 he scored a double hundred for the Sindh under-19
side. Watching him bat was the father of Pakistan cricket,
Abdul Hafeez Kardar.
Kardar thought the boy from Karachi
to be “the find of the decade”. With this recommendation,
Miandad soon found himself in the test side. On his debut,
against New Zealand, he came to the wicket at 44 for 3,
with Richard Hadlee on song. Soon Pakistan were 55 for 4.
Now the debutant engaged in a long, retrieving partnership
with the experienced Asif Iqbal, a man he resembled in quickness
of eye, fleetness of foot, and a relish for the fight. Asif
scored a century, as did Javed, the first of 23 hundreds
he was to make for his country.
Javed, or more likely his publisher,
has titled this book Cutting Edge. In years of watching
him at the ground and on television, I cannot remember many
edges. But there were plenty of cuts, slashed hard through
point. In addition he drove capably, was adept at playing
off his legs, and could pull and hook too. He was not a
particularly elegant player, but a greatly effective one.
One of my most painful cricketing memories is of seeing
a young Miandad hit my boyhood hero, B.S. Chandrasekhar,
for two straight sixes. Fifteen years later, I saw him similarly
dispatch a rather inferior wrist-spinner, Ian Salisbury
of England.
But, unlike so many of his countrymen,
Miandad was a fine player of fast bowling too. He got solidly
into line, and knew where his off stump was. He had a marvellous
record against Australia and the West Indies, the sides
that had the best new-ball bowlers. Beyond his technical
abilities, he paced his innings very well, and was a superb
runner between the wickets. All things considered, he ranks
just above Hanif Mohammed as Pakistan’s greatest ever batsman.
This cameo assessment of his batsmanship
is mine, not Javed’s. His autobiography itemizes his main
achievements, but naturally cannot analyse them. What it
does do, however, is to provide an extended and absolutely
frank assessment of his relationship with Imran Khan. In
character and background, they were a study in contrast.
One was an aristocrat who went to Oxford via a Lahore
public school, the other a plebeian, educated (for the most
part) in the streets of Karachi. One cavorted with artists
and millionaires in London, the other kept strictly to his
native social mileu. They were different, but they were
also contemporary. Thus it was Pakistan’s good fortune that
its best-ever bowler came to cricketing maturity at the
same time as its best-ever batsman.
Javed is generous in his praise
of Imran the cricketer. As a bowler he was “irreplaceable”.
The “combination of pace, guile and reverse-swing made Imran
absolutely lethal”. Then, “having mastered fast bowling,
he turned his attention to batting… with great method and
application”. Indeed, “Imran’s capacity for hard work is
an example to all aspiring cricketers”.
Miandad also handsomely praises
Imran’s leadership skills. When the Pathan became captain
of Pakistan, “he led from the front and created an atmosphere
in which there was no room for mediocrity. He made selection
strictly performance-based. Everyone feared for their place
in the side, and it motivated them to give of their best”.
It helped that unlike some other Pakistani cricket captains,
this one was squeaky clean. For, as Miandad points out,
“Imran’s is a famous name in cricket, but the great thing
is that it also remains an unvarnished name. There have
been no scandals, no allegations of him being anything less
than impeccably honest”.
At the same time, Miandad is critical
of Imran the team-man. For the better part of a decade the
two men alternated as captain. “As I did for other Pakistan
captains, so I gave my best for Imran as well,” writes Javed,
adding, “I was hurt when Imran did not return the gesture.”
He speaks of a series against Sri Lanka when “Imran didn’t
give me his full cooperation”. At other times, the Pathan
would opt out of the side when he was not named skipper.
Thus Imran played in only 13 of the 34 tests when Javed
was captain, whereas Javed played in as many as 46 of the
48 tests when Imran led the side. Yet, says Miandad meaningfully,
“both of us won the same number of Tests for Pakistan —
fourteen. I was present in each one of Imran’s test victories,
but he was present in only five of mine. All of his wins
came from a full-strength team, while more than half of
mine came from a team with a second-string bowling attack
from which our best bowler was missing”.
Cutting Edge also speaks
at length of the major team rivalry of Miandad’s career,
India versus Pakistan. There are analyses of tests
and series between the two sides, and a not excessively
self-congratulatory recounting of the famous last-ball six
in Sharjah. He advises the Indian Cricket Board to prepare
fast pitches if they want to produce their own equivalents
of Imran, Waqar and Wasim. And he meditates reflectively
on the linking of sport with patriotism. “A nation’s self-esteem
cannot be held hostage to its sporting fortunes,” he says,
“One has to stop seeing cricket as a proxy war and a cricket
loss as a political failure.”
The words in this book might have
been polished by the ghost-writer (Saad Shafqat), but the
thoughts are indisputably Miandad’s. Indeed, the book has
a directness notably absent in south Asian autobiographies,
whether sporting or otherwise. There are some sharp cricketing
judgments. Gavaskar, says Miandad, was a better batsman
than Tendulkar, Abdul Qadir a better wrist-spinner than
Shane Warne, and Muralitharan without doubt the best off
spinner in the history of the game. There are some perceptive
bits of psychology as well. Consider this, which applies
equally to India as it does to Pakistan: “Many of our star
players, after they have become successful on the field
and have received some public recognition, develop an inordinate
sense of their own importance. They cease to be team players
and expect special treatment. This divisive attitude disturbs
team unity and keeps us from rising to our true potential”.
This frankness should not surprise
us — what might are the bouts of empathy, so unexpected
in a man reckoned to be one of the toughest competitors
in the history of the game. When Pakistan dramatically beat
the Kiwis on their home turf in the semi-finals of the 1992
World Cup, Miandad recalled his side’s own loss in the same
stage of the tournament five years before. “Having been
in the Pakistan’s side that lost that greatly hyped-up World
Cup semi-final against Australia in 1987, I identified with
the New Zealand team. I was sad for them and for the New
Zealand public”.
Even more striking, perhaps, are
Miandad’s comments on the aftermath of the 1992 World Cup
final. After Pakistan won, Javed held his captain in a long
and utterly sincere embrace, and then wrapped the national
flag around him. Still later, Imran, speaking as the victorious
captain, did not so much as mention his players, dwelling
instead on the cancer hospital he was building in his mother’s
memory. To the independent observer, that victory speech
was a disgraceful exhibition of egotism. How must it have
felt to the slighted Pakistan team?
Listen to Miandad. It appears
he was not angry or hurt; rather, he could “sympathize with
Imran on this count. His public-speaking skills were modest
to begin with, and now he was asked to deliver such a high-profile
speech when he had just crowned his cricketing career with
the achievement of a lifetime”. Imran meant well, says Miandad.
That he said all the wrong things was only because he was
emotionally overwrought. “I should know,” comments Imran’s
great team-mate and rival, “because it was an intense emotional
moment for me as well. I had a huge lump in my throat —
but at least I had the option of not having to speak.”
|