|
|
| Carefree: Pedestrians
navigate traffic on a busy road | Md.
Ayub, Bright Street. No, jaywalkers should
not be penalised if there is no zebra crossing nearby. The Calcutta Police organises
Road Safety Week only once a year but that is not enough. Roads are supposed to
be maintained. Street lights do not function properly and most road accidents
happen at night. Dividers have not been erected on all roads, that’s why people
get trapped while navigating the traffic. First, the government should provide
safe passage to pedestrians and then only talk of penalising pedestrians.
Pritam
Chakraborty, Serampore.
If a person does
not find a zebra crossing when crossing a road, he or she should search for one
and then cross the road, because accidents may happen anytime. When such tragedies
happen, the driver is invariably found guilty. But that is not always true. About
80 per cent of the accidents happen due to carelessness of jaywalkers. So, jaywalkers
should be penalised even if there is no zebra crossing nearby.
Tapan
Pal, Batanagar.
Calcutta Police may not return
firepower to American Center shooters; but they are overzealous to show their
prowess to hapless pedestrians. At the JL Nehru Road-SN Banerjee Road crossing,
they fenced the footpath, but cannot enforce the stopline rule. Vehicles overshoot
the stopline and halt right on the zebra crossing. Pedestrians have to play cat
and mouse, zigzagging their way through roaring vehicles to cross the road. And
traffic cops watch the bird on the treetop that is not there. Do we really need
traffic policemen?
Sudipa Dutta Chowdhury,
Dum Dum Park.
If there are no zebra crossings
nearby, it would not be proper to penalise people. In our busy schedules, it is
not always possible to locate the zebra lines, walk the distance and then cross.
Besides, elderly people or children may find it difficult to make their way through
the crowded pavements during the rush hours. In such a situation it would be practical
to cross the roads at a spot where a traffic sergeant is posted. This will ensure
safety on the part of the pedestrians and drivers.
Ram
Chandra Ghosh, Panchanantala Road.
A jaywalker
should be penalised if there is no zebra crossing nearby.
Prasenjit
Adhikari, Paschim Putiary.
Where there is
no zebra crossing at a junction, people should be asked to be cautious while crossing
the road, noting signals and following the traffic police’s directions. Before
penalising pedestrians, the authorities should see whether the required infrastructure
is in place to allow passersby to cross the road according to rules.
Virendra
Shah, Amratala Lane.
When there is no zebra
crossing nearby, jaywalkers should not be penalised. But it does not give them
the licence to cross the road at any place either. The traffic police should try
to find out why jaywalkers are compelled to cross the road at unsuitable places.
To stop jaywalking, all footpaths must be cleared of hawkers and buses should
be made to stop properly at designated stands.
Sandipan
Dutta, Haridevpur.
The penalty should depend
on whether the right facilities are present for safely crossing the road. If the
traffic department cannot provide such facilities to the passersby, then there
is no question of penalising them.
Rhitam
Basak Beadon Street.
There are places where
a zebra crossing is absent but overbridges are present. But if neither is present,
jaywalkers should not be penalised. First and foremost, the authorities must ensure
that important intersections have both zebra crossing and overbridges and less
important roads have one of the two. Then only can jaywalkers be penalised.
Kavita
Maheshwari, Baidyabati.
Yes, I think jaywalkers
should be penalised even if there is no zebra crossing. Nowadays, due to a busy
schedule, people do not have time for rules. If pedestrians are penalised for
jaywalking, it is for their own benefit. A mistake on their part can lead to dire
consequences and the blame is on the cops on duty. They face the wrath of the
public and become the scapegoat for jaywalker’s follies.
Gopal
Patra, Sukantapally.
Jaywalkers should not
be penalised if there is no zebra crossing near an intersection. The deciding
factor is whether there are crossing facilities or not.
Pawan
Khanna, Address not given.
It seems that the
state government has developed a habit of making new laws every now and then,
without even analysing the basic pre-requisites for imposing them. First, there
was talk on green channels for traffic signals, then on penalties for persons
committing nuisance in public places and now against jaywalkering. A jaywalker
is a person who crosses roads carelessly or dangerously. But first, how many places
in Calcutta have zebra crossings? Even if they do exist, drivers do not halt before
them. They stop on the stripes. There is no walking space on the footpaths as
hawkers occupy them. So, jaywalkers should not be penalised if there is no zebra
crossing nearby.
Fakhre Alam, Tiljala
Lane.
No, I don’t think it will be a good decision.
In Calcutta, there are many streets where there is no zebra crossing. Here, what
would people do but cross roads at their own risk?
Seraj
Alam, Bansberia.
Haste makes waste. This popular
saying sums up the issue. There are certain rules and regulations governing traffic.
If a person violates traffic rules, he must be penalised. |