The Telegraph
Since 1st March, 1999
Email This PagePrint This Page
Pak linked to ‘rogue’ nuclear mission

Washington, Oct. 18: The Bush administration which has been caught off guard by Pyongyang’s admission of a clandestine nuclear programme faces more trouble in its path with a chorus here that Pakistan helped North Korea build its bombs.

Robert Einhorn, who was president Bill Clinton’s assistant secretary of state for non-proliferation, told The Washington Post that “North Korea and Pakistan have been known to engage in sensitive trade, including Pakistan’s purchase of Nodong missiles from North Korea.”

He was referring to Islamabad’s acquisition of North Korean missiles in 1997. The Pakistanis renamed these Nodong missiles as Ghauri and tested them a month before India’s nuclear tests in May 1998.

The Clinton administration imposed sanctions on North Korea’s Changgwang Sinyong Corporation and the Khan Research Laboratories in Pakistan for these missile deals.

Einhorn told the Post yesterday after Pyongyang’s admission became public that “US officials were concerned at the time about what the quid pro quo might be”.

He said of North Korean efforts to get overseas help for gas-centrifuge technology for enriching uranium for nuclear weapons. “Pakistan would be a possibility because it used gas centrifuges and its own nuclear weapons initially used enriched uranium.”

The New York Times quoted unnamed intelligence officials as saying: “What you have here is a perfect meeting of interests – the North had what the Pakistanis needed and the Pakistanis had a way for Kim Jong Il to restart a nuclear programme we had stopped.”

Although embarrassed Bush administration officials are, as yet, unwilling to discuss Pakistan’s role in arming North Korea with nuclear weapons, they are privately letting opinion circulate that all this happened two years before General Pervez Musharraf, their close ally, took power. But the US, which has a strong non-proliferation lobby within and outside the administration — as India knows after its Pokhran tests — is unlikely to let the issue rest there.

A forceful argument in support of holding Musharraf accountable will be that civilian leaders in Pakistan, be it Benazir Bhutto or Nawaz Sharif, had no say in their country’s nuclear programme.

Email This PagePrint This Page